(1) IN view ofthe following statements found inthe order ofthe High court: "WE have heard the leamed counsel for the parties. During the course of arguments, Mr. Sodhi leamed Sr. Adv. stated that the services ofthe workmen will only be terminated in accordance with law, that till their services are terminated, they for ail intents and purposes would be treated at par with the regular employees (watchmen) of the Corporation and that those workmen would get all the fringe benefits which the regular employees (watchmen) are getting. --- *** --- ON the other hand, Mr. Surjit Singh, leamed counsel for the workmen, accepted the statement of Mr. N.K. Sodhi and further stated that the workmen would not say no if they are sought to be transferred from one dept to another by the Corporation, It was also stated by the leamed counsel thatthe question of creating any post forthe workmen by the Food Corporation of India does not arise, as legally this may not be permissible and that the Corporation may proceed againstthe workmen only in accordance with law. IN view of what was stated at the bar, the leamed counsel for the parties are agreed that in view of their statements, these writ petitions be disposed of and to that extent the award of the tribunal be taken to have been modified." we do not think it is fit case for interference under Article 136 of the Constitution. Special leave petition is dismissed accordingly. COURT Master