JUDGMENT S.B. Sinha, J. This writ petition is directed against the order dated 21.4.1982 passed by the Sub-divisional Officer, Godda in Rice Milling Case No. 85 of 1978 whereby and where under the said authority cancelled the licence of the petitioner granted to him under Rice Milling Industries (Regulation) Act, 1958. The said order is contained in Annexure 3 to the writ petition. 2. From a perusal of the aforementioned order it appears that the petitioner was given notice that he had been collecting paddy without obtaining permission under clause 9 (2) of Government Order of 1981-82 and as such he was directed to show cause as to why he should not be prosecuted for commission of an offence under the Essential Commodities Act and as to why his licence should not be cancelled. 3. Upon perusal of the show cause submitted by the petitioner, it occurred to the Sub-divisional Officer, Godda that the petitioner has not yet filed any return in respect of the mill. The said licence was cancelled on the ground that there are irregularities therein. 4. It appears that the aforementioned note was given by some body, whose designation is not mentioned in Annexure 3. The Sub-divisional Officer upon the said note has appended a note "YATHA PRASTUAWIT" meaning there by 'as proposed'. 5. From a perusal of the said order, it is evident that the Subdivisions Officer did not apply his mind at all to the facts and circumstances of the case. Further, even from the note it is evident that the petitioners licence was sought to be cancelled as he had not submitted any return in respect of the mill in question. It appears that no notice wag issued to him therefor. In my opinion, it is not permissible in law. 6. In view of the fact that the petitioner was merely directed to show cause as to why his licence shall not be cancelled for allegedly procuring paddy without obtaining permission in respect thereof; his licence should not have been cancelled on any other ground for which no notice whatsoever was issued to him. 7. In this view of the matter, the impugned order as contained in Annexure, 3 to the writ petition is quashed but without any order as to costs.