ORDER : Ranganath Misra, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. In our order of 19th January, 1988 we had made it clear to protect the interest of the State that it was open to the State Government to make any fresh order for the disciplinary proceeding. We are told that on the basis of this indication in our order, without initiating regular disciplinary proceeding, the petitioners have been again put in suspension. We never indicated to authorise State Government to redirect suspension without doing anything more in the disciplinary proceeding. Obviously the order dated 19th February, 1988 is contrary to out direction and cannot be sustained, though there has been no regular petition challenging that order. In the facts and circumstances and the background indicated, we are of the view that order must not be permitted to be in operation. We accordingly set aside that order dated 19.2.1988. We are again reiterating that it is open to the State Government to make an order on the basis of any report that may have been received and after scrutinising the same and finding out the guilt of any particular person on the basis of facts stated in the report. No order should be made before regular disciplinary proceedings are commenced. 2. It would be open to the petitioners to challenge any adverse order made in an appropriate Court. C.M.Ps. are disposed of.