Research › Browse › Judgment

Supreme Court of India · body

1988 DIGILAW 437 (SC)

H. v. Haiide VS Janald Raniachandran

1988-05-10

B.C.RAY, G.L.OZA, K.JAGANNATHA SHETTY

body1988
(1) HEARD learned counsel for thfc parties. In the circumstances of the case it appears; that it would be proper that the magistrate having jurisdiction over the area where this property is situated may proceed with the proceedings under section 145 Crl.P.C.and decide as to which party was in possession on 31/01/1988, The order of the High court is set aside and the matter is sent back to the magistrate who has passed the order earlier. The learned magistrate shall dispose of these proceedings within two months from today. During this period, in our opinion, it would be proper that Smt. Janaki Ramachandran on her giving an undertaking that she will abide by the orders of the magistrate shall be allowed to continue to hold possession of the property as receiver appointed by order of this Court: and she will surrender the possession to ihe party which is declared to be entitied to possession after completion of proceedings under section 145 Cri.P.C. (2) THE appeals are disposed of accordingly.