JUDGMENT S.K. Lakhtakia, Member - This is a revision under Section 333 of U.P.Z.A. and L.R. Act against the order of the Additional Commissioner, Meerut dated May 26, 1982 through which, the revision filed against the order of the Additional Collector Bulandshahar dated December 23, 1981 was rejected. 2. The facts of this case in brief are that a Patta for Abadi rights was made in favour of the opposite party by the Sub-Divisional Officer under Section 122-C(4) of U.P. Act No. 1 of 1951. The revisionist filed an application before the Collector challenging the validity of the allotment. His application was rejected and the allotment was upheld. The revision filed against that order was also dismissed, hence this revision. 3. Heard the learned counsel for both the parties. Perused the record. 4. The learned D.G.C. (R.) argued that in the instant case the allotment was made under Section 122-C(4) by the S.D.O., hence his order was final under Section 122-C(7) of the said Act subject to the order of the Collector passed by him under sub-section (6) and that no revision can lie before the Board in such matters against the order of the Collector. 5. I have carefully gone through the provisions of Section 122-C(4) (6) and (7) and I find that the argument advanced by the learned D.G.C. (R.) is absolutely correct. Sub-section (7) of Section 122-C reads as follows: - "Every order passed by the Assistant Collector under sub-section (4) shall, subject to the provisions of sub-section (6) shall be final and the provisions of Section 333 shall not apply in relation thereto." In view of the above provision it is abundantly clear that the order passed by the S.D.O. for making allotment or by the Collector while dealing with the allotment so made by the S.D.O. are final and provisions of Section 33.3 of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act shall not apply in relation to such order. Consequently the orders passed by the Sub-Divisional Officer and the Collector in such matters attain finality and they cannot be subjected to scrutiny through any revision filed before this court or before the Additional Commissioner. The learned Additional Commissioner has, therefore, rightly held that the order passed by the learned Additional Collector is final under Section 122-C(7) of the said Act and it cannot be challenged in revision. 6. The learned Additional Commissioner has, therefore, rightly held that the order passed by the learned Additional Collector is final under Section 122-C(7) of the said Act and it cannot be challenged in revision. 6. After going through the relevant, provision I have to concur with the opinion arrived at by the learned Additional. Commissioner with the result that this revision is not maintainable and is dismissed.