Judgment : This is a petition under Sec.482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. 2. The respondents, the wife and child of the petitioner approached the Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sankari, for obtaining maintenance to the tune of Rs.500 for the wife and Rs.300 for child from the husband, under Sec.125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The petitioner herein remained ex parte and an order was passed by the Magistrate granting maintenance as prayed for. 3. The petitioner did not file any petition to set aside that ex parte order passed before the said magistrate himself. Instead he filed a revision before the Second Additional Sessions Judge, Salem, who reduced the amount of maintenance respectively to Rs.300 and Rs.200 by judgment dated 15.10.1985 which is now challenged before this Court. 4. A petition under Sec.482, Criminal Procedure Code can be filed to enable this Court to make such orders as may be necessary to give effect to any order under the Code, or to prevent abuse of process of any Court or otherwise to secure the ends of justice. The present petition obviously does not come under any of the first two categories. Further, as per Sec.397(3), Criminal Procedure Code, when a person has preferred a revision petition either to the High Court or to the Sessions Judge, no further application by the same person shall be entertained by the other of them. Therefore, there is a clear bar in the Code for the petitioner to file a revision. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner would urge that the amount that was fixed by the Sessions Court is too high for him to pay that he has already undergone one year imprisonment for default of payment and that therefore the order as it stands should be modified. But the proper way for that is not to come under Sec.482, Criminal Procedure Code before this Court in order to modify a revisional order which has become final. He should have instead either approached the Magistrate again under Sec.127, Criminal Procedure Code or filed a civil proceeding to fix the amount of maintenance as the civil proceeding is the final authority to fix maintenance. Upon such fixation the provisional order made by the Magisterial jurisdiction will automatically cease. With this observation this petition is dismissed.