JUDGMENT V.N. Khare, J. - This criminal revision under section 399/401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure was admitted on question of sentence. 2. Briefly, the facts of this case are that on 13.11.1981 the applicant was found selling and exposing for sale `Chane-Ki-Dal' by Food Inspector. Suspecting the said edible to be adulterated, the Inspector purchased the said `Chane-Ki-Dal' and filed the same in three phials in equal quantity and labels were also affixed on the phials. Subsequently, the phials were sealed. There after, the Food Inspector submitted the samples and other papers to the Public Analyst where the samples were reported to be adulterated. After the sanction having been granted the charge-sheet under section 7/16 of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act was submitted before the Court. 3. The trial court found that the prosecution case was proved and convicted the accused and sentenced him to one year's rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 2,000/- and in default the applicant was ordered to undergo a further imprisonment of six month. On appeal the conviction and sentence were upheld and that is how the applicant has come before this Court. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant argued that under the law the minimum sentence that can be awarded to the applicant on the charge having been proved was six months' rigorous imprisonment and a maximum fine of Rs. 1,000/-, and therefore the sentence and fine awarded by the court below are contrary to law. Besides that the applicant has already undergone imprisonment for a period of three months and 19 days and he has already deposited the fine of Rs. 1,000/-. In view of the argument of the learned counsel for the applicant, I find that the sentence awarded by the court below is liable to be modified. 5. The revision is allowed in part to the extent that the conviction of the applicant is upheld but the period of a sentence is reduced to the period already undergone and the fine already deposited. The applicant is on bail. His bail bonds are discharged.