JUDGMENT K.P. Singh, J. - Against the impugned order dated 7-1-89, the petitioner has approached this court under Article 226 of the Constitution The petitioner is also persuing a remedy for setting aside the order dated 7.1.89 and the application for setting aside the aforesaid order is pending before the revisional court. The revisional court has not granted any stay order to the petitioner with the result the petitioner has approached this court. 2. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner, I do not consider it a fit case for interference with the impugned Judgement at this stage specially when the petitioner is persuing another remedy. Bids of justice demand that an observation be made to the effect that the petitioner may not be evicted from the land in his occupation till bis application for setting aside the ex-parte order is disposed of by the revisional court. 3. With the above observation, the writ petition is finally disposed of at this stage, but it is expected of the revisional court that it shall see the petitioner is not evicted from the land in his occupation til his application for setting aside the ex - parte order is disposed of. 4. A copy of this order may be given to the learned counsel for the petitioner on payment of usual charges within 24 hours.