Research › Browse › Judgment

Rajasthan High Court · body

1989 DIGILAW 385 (RAJ)

Jamil Ahmed v. State Of Rajasthan

1989-05-18

G.K.SHARMA

body1989
JUDGMENT 1. - I would like to observe that when case under Section 494, Indian Penal Code is compoundable, the offence under Section 498A, Indian Penal Code which is connected with the case of offence under Section 494, Indian Penal Code should also be made compoundable with the permission of the court. 2. This petition under Section 482, Criminal Procedure Code praying that the remark mentioned in Para 5 of the Order dated 3-5-1989 passed by the Sessions Judge Kota, be impugned. 3. Jamil Ahmed filed a complaint under Sections 416 to 419, 120B & 420, Indian Penal Code against the Non-Petitioners Nos. 2 & 3. The learned Magistrate forwarded the complaint under Section 156, Clause 3, Criminal Procedure Code to the Police Station, Kaithooni Pole, Kota for necessary action. The case was registered at the Police Station and investigation started. The Non-Petitioners Nos. 2 & 3 moved an application under Section 438, Criminal Procedure Code for anticipatory bail and the learned Sessions Judge vide impugned order dated 3-5-1989 granted the application but in Para 5 of the Order he observed that "No offence under Section 482, Criminal Procedure Code is allowed.Application allowed. *******