V.S. DAVE, J.—Accused-petitioner is facing trial for offence under S, 302 IPC in the Court of Sessions Judge, Sikar. The accused was arrested in March, 1988 and he moved an application for bail under S. 439 Cr.P.C. before this court which was rejected by this Court on 10.5.88 observing that it would be open to the petitioner to move a bail application after the charge-sheet is submitted. The accused thereafter had moved another bail appilcation on August 1, 1988 after submission of the charge-sheet but that too was rejected. However, direction was given to the trial court to complete the trial within four months from the date of receipt of this order. Copy of the order was communicated to the learned Sessions Judge, Sikar, vide letter No. CR/Judl/88/6856 dated 9.9.88. But till date trial is not complete despite the fact that 8 months have elapsed. 2. Public Prosecutor could not furnish any cogent reason for not completing the prosecution evidence till now. The accused cannot be kept indefinitely in custody for latches on the part of the prosecution in completing the trial, particularly when the directions are issued by this court, Non-observ-ance of the direction of this court is a matter to be seriously viewed. In this view and the circumstances of the case I am inclined to grant indulgence to the accused. 3. It is therefore, ordered that the accused petitioner Keshar son of Pokhar r/o Swami Ki Dhani be released on bail provided be furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties in sum of Rs. 5000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial court with stipulation to appear in that court as and when called upon to do so during the pendency of the trial against him in this case.