Research › Browse › Judgment

Karnataka High Court · body

1990 DIGILAW 100 (KAR)

SUDHAKAR v. LAKSHMAMMA

1990-02-28

K.S.BHATT

body1990
SHIVASHANKAR BHAT, J. ( 1 ) CIVIL Revision Petition is filed by the tenant against an order of eviction made under Section 29 (4) of the Karnatjka Rent control Act (hereinafter referred to as the act ). ( 2 ) THE landlord has filed an eviction petition seeking eviction of the tenant under Section 21 (1) (a) and (h) of the Act. During the pendency of the proceedings the landlord also filed an application under section 29 of the Act since the tenant was in arrears. On 30-3-1987 the Court mada an order under Section 29 of the Act determining the rate of rent and the arrears payable by the tenant as Rs. 39,800/- as on the said date. The tenant was given a month's time and accordingly he deposited the samo within the time given by the court. In fact, there was 6 days delay there also. The rate of rent determined by the Court was Rs. 1. 400/-per month. The tenant, thereafter did not deposit the rent till 18 9-1987 on which date he deposited a sum of Rs. 7. 600/- being 5 months rent. Subsequently, the payments were as follows: