JUDGMENT U.C. Srivastava. J. 1. Admit. 2. As a very short question is involved, the writ petition is being disposed of finally with the consent of the parties' counsel. The petitioner has challenged order of compulsory retirement. In the counter affidavit it has been stated before the Public Services Tribunal that there are ten adverse entries against him. The petitioner contended that no adverse entry was communicated to him. It is strange that the Tribunal did not consider this question and thus ignored even basic principles of law and, as such, the judgment suffers from manifest error of law. 3. Consequently, the writ petition is allowed. The order dated 18.12.89 contained in annexure 8 is quashed. Public Services Tribunal and opposite party No. 1 is directed to decide the case afresh taking into consideration correct factual and legal position. The case will be decided by another Tribunal and it will decide the case within a period of three months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order before it. No order as to cost.