JUDGMENT 1. - Heard. This application for grant of bail is under section 439 Cr.P.C. It is true that the petitioner had absconded for about ten years and in the normal course the order of the learned Addl. Sessions Judge Neemkathana cannot be said to be un-reasonable. However some further facts have been brought to my notice including the fact that all the co-accused who faced trial in Cr. Case No. 3/87 arising from the same incident stood acquitted vide judgment dated 17.9.90 of the trial court. I have perused the findings given by the said Court while acquitting the co-accused. The petitioner is in jail for the last more than one month after his re-arrest. The trial in the case is not likely to be concluded within two months as directed by the trial court. 2. Taking into consideration all the facts and circumstances of the case I am of the view that the petitioner should be released on bail on heavy bail bonds. It is therefore directed that the accused petitioner Yadram s/o Narain shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 20,000/- (Twenty thousand only) with two sureties on the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the trial court for his appearance in that Court during the pendency of the trial subject to the following condition : That the petitioner shall not leave the State of Rajasthan till the completion of the trial without prior permission of the trial Court. Bail granted. *******