JUDGMENT 1. - Heard, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Public Prosecutor. 2. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that there are cross-cases, though the report made on behalf of the petitioners was not accepted by the SHO. Bhagmal has sustained one grievous injury which has been attributed to the petitioner Nathi Singh. 3. From the side of the accused persons, 3 persons are alleged to have sustained injuries, one Balveer has sustained a grievous injury and Smt. Bhawani W/O Reghaveer has also sustained injuries. As per the prosecution case, the incident took-place on 21.8.90, but the report has been lodged on 23.8.90 i.e. after two days. Taking into consideration all the fa ts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant pre-arrest bail to both the accused petitioners under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Consequently I allow this bail application. 4. The SHO/Arresting Officer. Investigating Officer, Police Station. Nadbai, District Bharatpur, in F.I.R. No. 2.9.90. is, therefore, directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioners Jahan Singh S. O. Nathi Singh and Nathi Singh S/O Dalgaji, they be released on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with one surely in the like amount to his satisfaction on the following conditions:- (a) that the petitioners shall make themselves available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (b) that the petitioners shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case, so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court, or to any other police officer; and (c) that the petitioners shall not leave India without the previous permission of the court. Bail Granted. *******