Research › Browse › Judgment

Rajasthan High Court · body

1990 DIGILAW 786 (RAJ)

Yuva Sahayogi Sangh v. State of Rajasthan

1990-12-19

A.K.MATHUR

body1990
JUDGMENT 1. - Petitioner by this writ petition has prayed that the respondents may be directed to allow the Members of the petitioner Sangh on the post of Shiksha Sahyogis on which they were appointed after due selection. Petitioners have submitted that petitioners' Sangh has worked in the Panchayat Samiti Loonkaransar District Bikaner and persons whose names are given in Schedule "A" are its members Petitioners' members applied for the post of Shikaha Sahyogis and after the interviews by the Selection Committee they were appointed. Thereafter their services are terminated. Hence present writ petition. 2. A return has been filed by the respondents in which it has been pointed out that the scheme of Shiksha Sahyogi which was issued by the Government has been discontinued by the order Ex R/1 dated 21st July, 1990. It was also mentioned in the order that no recruitment under the scheme shall be made in view of Government order dated 8.5, 1990. The appointment of petitioners was for fixed term i.e. 16.05,1990 and he further extension has been given to the petitioners. The allegation that the petitioners were at pointed substantively is also denied. 3. 1 have heard learned counsel and perused the record. 4. As a matter of fact the appointment of the petitioners itself was for a fixed term which is evident from their appointment order dated 23rd March, 1990 Anx. R/2 i.e. upto 16th of May 1950 It was not extended further. Therefore no relief can be given to the petitioners. Moreover the scheme under which petitioners were appointed has not (sic) been discontinued. From that account also no relief on that count can be given to the petitioners. In this view of the matter I do not find any merit in the writ petition and the same is dismissed.Petition dismissed. *******