JUDGMENT S.H.A. Raza, J. - Earlier the petitioner had invoked the jurisdiction of this Court by filing a writ petition challenging the order of suspension. The writ petition was disposed of with the direction to the opposite parties to conclude the enquiry within three months from the date of the submission of reply by the petitioner. It was further observed by this court that the opposite parties would serve charge sheet within two weeks from the date of production of a copy of the order on the opposite parties and in case despite full cooperation of the petitioner the enquiry would not be concluded the petitioner would be free to approach the court for quashing the entire proceedings of suspension. The said order was passed on 26-10-88 by a Bench of this Court consisting of Honble Mr. Justice U.C. Srivastava (as he then was) and Honble Mr. Justice Rajeshwar Singh (as he then was). 2. The petitioner in the month of May, 1989 again invoked the jurisdiction of this Court for quashing the entire disciplinary proceedings on the ground that the order passed by this Court was not complied with. On 25-8-89 the opposite parties preferred an application for extension of five months further time to conclude the enquiry. It seems that even after lapse of a year the enquiry proceedings were not concluded in spite of the directions by this Court in earlier writ petition. There is no denial of the fact that the charge sheet was served on the petitioner on 3-10-88 and a really thereto was submitted by him on 29-1-89. Even today, the learned standing Counsel is not in a position to make a statement before this Court as to whether the enquiry was concluded or not. No useful purpose will be served in keeping this writ pending unnecessarily. In view of the fact that in spite of the directions of this Court the enquiry was not concluded Within the stipulated time, the order of suspension dated 30-7-88 contained in annexure-1 stands revoked. The opposite parties are directed to re-instate the petitioner on his post and pay him full salary and allowance for the period of suspension and other consequential benefits. However, it will be open for the opposite parties to continue the enquiry if the same has not been concluded. 3. With the aforesaid observations the writ petition stands finally disposed of.