JUDGMENT Order passed by the Rent Controlling Authority, Gwalior, for short 'The Authority', on 30.11.90 is assailed. Proceedings under the M.P. Accommodation Control Act, 1961, for short 'the Act', are of summary nature and are mandated to be completed within a statutory period of six months. As such, I have considered it unnecessary to retain the matter here by noticing the non- petitioner. The petition is disposed of accordingly in terms of the following directions:- (i) The Authority shall give two week's time to the non- petitioner (Landlord, who had instituted the proceedings under section 23-A of the Act, for eviction) to make complete the application, which he filed in Form-A under Rule 3 of the Rules framed under the Act; necessary particulars shall be furnished in regard to Columns No. 13 and it shall be stated by him as to the date of which accommodation was let out to the tenant and all the details of the agreement as contemplated thereunder. In Column No. 18 is required to be furnished relevant information and in the instant case what is required to be done is that landlord should furnish the particulars of his title-deed under which he had acquired the property in virtue of which he claimed eviction exercising his right thereunder as owner of the premises. (ii) If the tenant-non-petitioner expresses his objection and shows valid grounds for non-compliance with the direction made above the Authority shall give him two week's time to approach this Court [or obtaining orders of this Court for dealing with the matter otherwise. I now propose to state reasons for the directions made aforesaid. (ii) If the tenant-non-petitioner expresses his objection and shows valid grounds for non-compliance with the direction made above the Authority shall give him two week's time to approach this Court [or obtaining orders of this Court for dealing with the matter otherwise. I now propose to state reasons for the directions made aforesaid. Because by the impugned order application of the tenant- petitioner in respect of the above matter has been rejected, I have found much substance in the submissions of Shri Bharadwaj that the disputed premises being situate in the city of Gwalior the provisions of section 23-G (2) (b) are applicable and it is for this reason that there is a necessity for particulars to be furnished in respect of Column No. 13 of Form No. A. Secondly, though there may be justification for the Authority to reject the application for better particulars, in the facts and circumstances of the case I am of the view that the-applicant, landlord's duty it was to furnish "relevant information" against Column No. 18 in Form-A in regard Lo acquisition of title of the suit premises. That not having been done, he is required to do that to make his application full, complete and valid to be tried and decided in accordance with law. Revision disposed of in terms of above direction.