Research › Browse › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

1991 DIGILAW 286 (PAT)

Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Bhagirathi Devi

1991-08-06

B.C.BASAK, G.C.BHARUKA

body1991
Judgment G.C.Bharuka, J. 1. This reference is under Sec. 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter to be referred to as "the Act" only). The Tribunal has referred the following questions of law for the opinion of this court : "1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal has rightly held that the Commissioner of Income-tax, acting under Section 203(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, could not interfere with an order of assessment made under Sec. 143(1) in pursuance of the scheme to help new taxpayers in small income groups launched by the Government ? 2, Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal has rightly cancelled the order passed by the Commissioner of Income-tax under Sec. 263(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for the assessment years 1971-72 and 1972-73 ?" 2. On facts similar to the present case, the answer has already been given by this court in various decisions including in the case of CIT V/s. Pushpa Devi [1987] 164 ITR 639, CIT V/s. Smt. Rambha Devi [1987] 164 ITR 658, CIT V/s. Smt Sharda Devi Lath [1989] 175 ITR 566 and in the case of CIT V/s. Smt Krishna Devi [1989] 175 ITR 591. 3. For the reasons given in the reported cases referred to above, both the questions referred to us in this reference are answered in the negative, in favour of the Revenue and against the assessee. In the facts and circumstances of this case, there shall be no order as to costs. 4. Let a copy of this judgment be transmitted to the Assistant Registrar, Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, B Bench, Patna, in terms of Sec. 260 of the Act. B.C.Basak, J. 5 I agree.