Satrudharl Chandrasekhar Raju v. Yricherla Pradeep Kumar Dev
1991-10-22
KULDIP SINGH, RANGANATH MISRA
body1991
DigiLaw.ai
JUDGMENT : 1. Taken on Board. Heard counsel for the appellant as also for the respondent No. 1 who has entered appearance as Caveator. 2. The appeal is admitted. Notice may issue to the non-appearing respondent. Respondent No. 1 takes notice. Pending appeal, the appellant shall be permitted to participate in the debate of the Legislature and sign the Register, but would not be entitled to cast any vote.