Gurnam Singh S/o Balwant Singh v. State of Rajasthan
1991-12-13
Y.R.MEENA
body1991
DigiLaw.ai
JUDGMENT 1. - Heard Learned counsel for the accused petitioners and learned Public Prosecutor for the State. 2. There is no compliance of provisions of Sections 42, 50, 51 and 57. The prosecution witnesses of the recovery has not supported the prosecution case, they declared hostile. The petitioners are in custody since 7-8-91. Considering the statements of prosecution witnesses in respect of recovery and also the non-compliance of the provisions of Sections 42, 50, 51 and 57. In my view it is proper to grant bail. Hence, it is ordered that the accused petitioners be enlarged on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two suretis of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of Learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Chittorgarh to appear before him on the next date of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. *******