JUDGMENT Bhairo Prasad, Member. - This reference has been made by the Additional commissioner Gorakhur Division, Gorakhpur vide his order dated 12.7.1990. 2. A proceeding under Section 167 of U.P. Act No. 1 of 1951 started before the court of the Collector Siddhartha Nagar. It was decided against the revisionist. The revisionist filed the application before the Additional Commissioner that the plot in question has become abadi. The learned Additional Commissioner recommended the revision on this ground that the order of the trial court should be set aside. 3. Heard the learned counsel of the revisionist. Opposite party is absent. Perused the record. 4. It has been raised that when the question of nature of land has been raised that whether it is abadi or agricultural land it is first of all the trial court is to decide it whether disputed plot is abadi or not? If the disputed plot is abadi then the trial Court to consider whether the revenue court has jurisdiction to decide it or not? Therefore, the reference is accepted but the case is remanded to the trial court to decide afresh in view of the recommendation of the Additional Commissioner on this point.