JUDGMENT Bhairo Prasad, M. - This reference has been made by the Additional Commissioner, Gorakhpur Division, Gorakhpur vide his recommendation dated 24.8.90 under Section 333-A of U.P. Act No. 1 of 1951 against the order of the Additional Collector Basti dated 1,12.1981 passed in a proceeding under Section 198 (4) of U.P. Act No. 1 of 1951. 2. In brief the facts of this case are that the allotment of me revisionist were challenged before the Collector. The Collector after taking the evidence of the parties came to he conclusion that the allotment is valid except plot No. 38 area 0-13-7 and plot No. 39 area 0-6-6 ace the land of public utility, therefore, the leases were cancelled for these two plots and rest of the allotment was found to be valid. The revision was filed against the order of the Additional Collector before the Additional Commissioner Gorakhpur Division, Gorakhpur. The Addl. Commissioner has referred the revision that the allotment of the plot No. 38 should be cancelled but the allotment of plot No. 39 area 0-6-6 is perfectly valid, hence it need not be cancelled, therefore, he recommended that the revision should be partly allowed and the order of the trial court be set aside in respect of plot No, 49 area 0-6-6 also. 3. No one has appeared in the proceeding. Application has been filed from the side of the petitioner in this court with the effect that the village have been under consolidation operation, therefore, proceeding has abated, but the cancellation of the allotment of land, proceeding is under the exclusive jurisdiction of the revenue authority i.e. revenue court, hence these proceedings will not abate. After perusal of the record I agree with the recommendation of the Additional Commissioner and the reference is accepted. The revision is partly allowed and the order of the trial court is modified to the effect that the allotment of plot No. 39 area 0-6-6 is also valid. Reference is decided accordingly.