JUDGMENT Bhairo Prasad, Member. - These two references has been made by the Addl. Commissioner, Agra Division, Agra vide his recommendation dated 9-8-1988 under Section 133-A of U.P.Z.A. Act No. 1 of 1951. 2. In brief the facts of these cases are that Triloki filed application under Rule 115-F O U.P.S.A. and L.R. Rules that Bhumi Prabandhak Samiti has allotted his plot to Opp. Party Bharat Singh and others. The plot in dispute is 68 area 0.25 of village Tariha, pergana Kishni Tahsil Bhogaon District Manipuri. This land was recorded his bhumidhari land before the consolidation operation and after the consolidation operation. The Opp. parties appeared and contested the proceeding. The learned Addl. Collector vide his order dated 8-1-1988 cancelled the lease on the ground that none of the allottees have given any evidence in support of their lease, therefore, he cancelled the leases. Revision was filed against that order. The learned Addl. Commissioner has recommended that it should be allowed and the trial court should be directed to wait to decided these revision till a revision filed by the revisionist in the court of consolidation is decided. Heard the learned counsel for both the parties. Perused the record. 3. It is admitted by both the parties that a revision is pending in consolidation court about the right and title of the disputed plots. The right and title has been decided in favour of the opposite parties against which revision is pending, therefore, the Land management Committee had no right to allot the land till the right was finally decided in favour of the Gaon Sabha. The consolidation order at present is in favour of the Opp. parties. 4. In these circumstances of the case the references cannot be accepted and the order passed by the trial court is restored on these grounds. If the right and title of Gaon Sabha is decided in accordance with law then the Land Management Committee can consider for the allotment and there is no bar for the allotment if the right of the Gaon Sabha is decided by any competent court. Subsequently, there is no force in the these reference. They are accordingly dismissed. This order shall govern Reference No.35 and 36 of 1988-89 in mainpuri.