DHARMATMA PRASAD MISHRA v. SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER (ELECTRICITY)
1992-03-20
B.S.YADAV, V.B.ERADI, Y.KRISHNAN
body1992
DigiLaw.ai
V. Balakrishna Eradi ( 1 ) THE Complainant in case No. 4 of 1990 on the file of the District Consumers Forum, Basti is the Revision Petitioner before us. The grievance put forward by him before the District Forum was that the Electricity connection to his residence was illegally disconnected by the respond. ( 2 ) SUMMARY disposal of a first appeal by the State Commission was not just, fair or proper in law. The District Forum was perfectly justified in awarding Rs. 500. 00 by way of compensation to the complainant. The interference made by the State Commission with the award of compensation made by the District Forum, without slating any reason for such interference, was manifestly illegal. The order of the State Commission in so far as it has disallowed the compensation of Rs. 500. 00 to the complainant set aside.