JUDGMENT S.R. Yadav, Member. - This is a reference made by the learned Addl. Commissioner, Allahabad Division, Allahabad in a revision recommending the revision be allowed, the impugned order of the Addl. Collector be set aside and the case be remanded to the Addl. Collector, Fatehpur for decision afresh. 2. The facts of the case, in brief, area that Sheo Shanker moved an application under Rule 11-N of the U.P. Z.A. and L.R. Rules for cancellation of lease granted by the L.M.C. for abadi sites in respect of Ram Sewak and Jagdish Prasad over plot No. 232 are 15-19-0 situate in village Khanpur Qadeem pargana Kora Distt. Fatehpur. The learned Addl. Collector Fatehpur vide his order dated 29.2.88 cancelled the lease. Against this order a revision was filed before the Commissioner, Allahabad Division. The learned Addl. Commissioner has made the aforesaid recommendation. 3. I have heard the learned counsels for the parties and perused the records. The learned counsel for the revisionist argued that the reference made by the learned Addl. Commissioner be accepted and the revision be allowed. The learned counsel for the opposite party argued the revision was not maintainable. Hence the reference should not be accepted and the revision be dismissed. 4. After hearing the parties and perusing the records it is clear that the main question involved in the matter is whether the revision was maintainable or not. From the perusal of the record it is crystal clear that the lease in question was for abadi site and for cancellation of such a lease a clear cut provision has been made in Sec. 122-C of the U.P. Z.A. and L.R. Act. Under sub-sec. (6) of Sec. 122-C the order passed by the Collector/Addl. Collector shall be final and was not kept even subject to revision vide sub-sec. (7) of Sec. 122-C of the Act. The above mentioned provision is clear that the order passed under Sec. 122-C (6) of the Act in proceedings for cancellation of lease for abadi site is final and no revision would lie under Sec. 333 or 333-A of the U.P. Z.A. and L.R. Act. In the present case the order passed by the Addl. Collector dated 29.2.88 was an order passed under Sec. 122-C (6) and the same is not revisable. 5. In the result the reference is not accepted and the revision is accordingly dismissed.