D. P. Wadhwa, J. ( 1 ) NOBODY appears for. the appellant to preaa thisappeal. ( 2 ) THE land in question is situated in the village Kusumpur. Anotification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short theact ) was issued on 23/01/1965 and a declaration under Section 6 of theact on 6/09/1966. The award was given on 25/11/1968. ( 3 ) THE learned Collector awarded compensation at the rate ofrs. 2,500. 00 per bigha. On a reference made to the District Court undersection 18 of the Act the learned Additional District Judge by judgmentdated 21/12/1974 enhanced the compensation at the rate of Rs. 5000. 00per bigha. The appellant-Union of India filed this appeal under Section 54of the Act. To this cross-objections have been filed by the respondentsclaiming compensation at the rate of Rs. 15,000. 00 per bigha. These cross-objections have been registered. Respondents have also paid the requisite Courtfee. ( 4 ) IT has been submitted before us that there are two villages, namely,kusumpur and Moradabad Pahari, adjoining each other. In the case ofacquisition of land in village Moradabad Pahari which is also subject-matter ofthe same notification, the learned Additional District Judge,, relying on ajudgment made by another Additional District Judge, in the present case alsofixed the compensation at the rate of Rs. 5000. 00 per bigha. Against that anappeal was filed by the owner of the land and this Court by judgment dated 2/01/1986 enhanced the compensation to Rs. 15,000. 00 per bigha. Theappellants there were also awarded interest at the rate of 12% per annum andsolatium at the rate of 30% on the market value relying on the Amending Actof 1984. This was, however, subject to the decision of the Supreme Court insomewhat similar case. ( 5 ) MR. Jain, learned Counsel for the cross-objectors, submitted thatland in both the villages is of similar nature and in fact, he said, the land in thevillage Kusumpur is more fertile than that in the village Moradabad Pahari. If the land is of the same nature, Mr. Jain says, compensation in the presentcase should also be at the rate of Rs. 15,000. 00 per bigha. We see no reasonnot to accept this argument and there is also no reason why should we notrely on the judgment of this Court in the case of land in the village Moradabadpahari. If the land is of the same nature, Mr. Jain says, compensation in the presentcase should also be at the rate of Rs. 15,000. 00 per bigha. We see no reasonnot to accept this argument and there is also no reason why should we notrely on the judgment of this Court in the case of land in the village Moradabadpahari. ( 6 ) ACCORDINGLY, the appeal is dismissed and the cross-objections areallowed. The compensation of the land in question shall be payable at therate of Rs. 15. 000. 00 per bigha with interest at the rate of 6% per annum andsolatium at the rate of 15% from the date the possession of the land was takenover by the Collector. Any amount paid or received earlier by the respondcnt/crossobjectors shall be liable to be adjusted. Cross-objections are, therefore,allowed with costs limited to court fee only.