JUDGMENT 1. - Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor for the State and perused the case diary. 2. It is averred in the petition that there was a dispute in between the complainants and the accused Sukhdeo Singh and four others. They are by caste Jat Sikh and the petitioner is Bisnoi. The petitioner's father is Sarpanch of the village and he has been wrongly implicated as he was cot supporting the complainants. No over tact of the petitioner has been shown in the FIR. The challan has also been put in the Court and in that only the five accused are involved and there also the petitioner has not been named. 3. Considering the facts, I am of the view that it is proper case for grant of bail under Section 438, Cr. PC. Hence, it is ordered that petitioner Raja Ram in the event of his arrest in FIR No. 94/91 of Police Station, Shri Vijay Nagar, be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the SHO of Police Station Sri Vijay Nagar to appear during investigation, enquiry and trial. This bail shall be subject to the following conditions : 1. That the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required. 2. That the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or to any officer. 3. That the petitioner shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court. Bail granted. *******