JUDGMENT Shri Newalkar submitted that a false complaint has been lodged against the accused-applicants by non-applicant No.2 and that when the applicants go to Ratlam to attend hearings they are harassed by elder brother of non-applicant No.2. This elder brother is a police officer. The application for transfer does not set out the designation or rank of the police officer. It also does not give any particulars of harassment. Questioned by the Court Shri Newalkar after consulting one of his clients, who is present in the Court, stated that elder brother of the Non-applicant No.2 is Town Inspector, Incharge of Harijan Welfare Police Station, Ratlam. He submitted that the case should be transferred to Indore. In support of his contention Shri Newalkar relied on Rajkumar v. State of M.P. (1982 MPWN Note No. 329). Opposing Shri Newalkar's contention Shri Pandya stated that elder brother of the N.A. No.2 had been suspended but he is not sure whether he has been reinstated. He submitted that only on the allegations of harassment by elder brother of N.A. No.2 the case does not merit to transfer from Ratlam to Indore. In support of his contention shri Pandya relied on Narayansingh and others v. State of M.P. ( 1987 MPLJ 387 ). Questioned by Court Shri Newalkar stated that witnesses in the complaint filed against the applicants belonged to Ratlam. In Rajkwnar v. State of M.P. (Supra) on which Shri Newalkar has placed reliance, harassment by police was considered sufficient for transferring the case from one district to another. From going through the case, however, it is seen that the particulars of harassment were set out in great detail which is lacking in the present case. The allegation of harassment made against brother of non-applicant No.2 is vague. In Narayan Singh's case (Supra) on which Shri Pandya has placed reliance allegations of terrorisation made against an advocate, who is brother of the complainant and where the applicants apprehended danger to their lives was considered insufficient for transferring the case. On the vague and general allegation of harassment, no justification for transferring the case from Ratlam to Indore is made. The ratio of decision in Narayansingh's case (supra) would support this view. Application dismissed. Record of the lower Court be sent expeditiously. 1982 MPWN 329 and 1987 MPLJ 387 discussed.