JUDGMENT A perusal of the award passed clearly indicates that the arbitrator has decided all the points which have been referred to him by the Court for adjudication. The evidence led by the appellant indicate that he has never requested the arbitrator for production of any oral evidence and he has relied on the documentary evidence placed before the arbitrator. Nothing could be shown to this Court that the award passed by the arbitrator is vague or that the arbitrator has failed to adjudicate the matter in dispute or that the appellant was not given a fair hearing or that the arbitrator had not followed the principles of natural justice. No misconduct on the part of the arbitrator, legal or otherwise, was brought to the notice of this Court. An award passed by the arbitrator can only be set aside if it falls within the mischief of section 30 of the Arbitration Act. When the Court is called upon to decide the objections raised by the parties against the arbitration award, the jurisdiction of the Court is limited to the extent indicated in the Arbitration Act and not beyond that. The learned counsel appearing for the appellant is unable to point out any infirmity in the arbitration award or the judgment delivered by the lower Court, which could be a ground for interfering with the award passed by virtue of section 30 of the Arbitration Act. Appeal dismissed.