JUDGMENT : G.P. Mathur, J. Parties have exchanged affidavits and therefore, the writ petition is being disposed of finally at the admission stage. 2. Smt. Bishambhari Devi, landlord Respondent No. 3, filed an application u/s 21(8) of Uttar Pradesh Act No. 13 of 1972 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) against the Chairman, Uttar Pradesh Electricity Board, and Executive Engineer, Electricity Distribution Division (I), Saharanpur, for enhancement of rent of premises bearing No. 2/2419 Gill colony, Saharanpur, which is under the tenancy of the Petitioners. The case of the landlord, in brief was that the premises in dispute were let out to the Petitioners on a monthly rent of Rs. 2500/- per month on the basis of an agreement dated 8-9-1982; that in view of the extent and location of the premises the rent being paid by the Petitioners was inadequate and that the same deserved to be enhanced to Rs. 4772.50. The application was contested by the Petitioners on various grounds. The Rent Control & Eviction officer after consideration of evidence on record held that the rent of the premises should be Rs. 4551/- per month and further directed that the landlord would be entitled to rent at the said rate with effect from the date of application moved by her, i.e. 1-3-1988. The appeal preferred by the Petitioners was also dismissed by the 7th Addl. District Judge, Sharanpur on 16-7-1990. 3. Sri Rajesh Kumar, learned Counsel for the Petitioners, has submitted that the application moved by the landlord u/s 21(8) of the Act was not maintainable as the Uttar Pradesh State Electricity Board was not State Government or local authority or public sector Corporation or a recognised educational institution. Sri V.K. Gupta, learned Counsel for the Respondent, has submitted that the Electricity Board is a public sector corporation and, therefore, the application is maintainable. 4. Section 3(p) of Uttar Pradesh Act No. 13 of 1972 reads as follows: Public sector Corporation means any corporation owned or controlled by the Government, including any company, as defined in Section 3 of the Companies Act, 1956, in which not less than fifty percent of the paid up share capital is held by the Government. 4. Section 3(p) of Uttar Pradesh Act No. 13 of 1972 reads as follows: Public sector Corporation means any corporation owned or controlled by the Government, including any company, as defined in Section 3 of the Companies Act, 1956, in which not less than fifty percent of the paid up share capital is held by the Government. U.P. State electricity Board has been constituted by the state Government In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 5 of the Electricity Supply Act, 1948 (hereinafter referred to as the Electricity Act) Section 12 of the Act provides that the board shall be a body corporate by the name notified under Sub-section (1) of Section 5, having perpetual succession and a seal with power to acquire and hold property both movable and immovable and shall by the said name sue and be sued. Section 12-A provides that the State Government may direct that the Board shall be a body corporate with such capital as may be fixed by the Government. Thus the State Electricity Board Is constituted and its capital is fixed by the State Government. Section 8 provides that the Chairman and other members of the Board shall hold office for such period as may be prescribed and Section 10 provides that the State Government may suspend from office or may remove any member of the Board on the grounds enumerated therein. Section 15 provides that the appointment of the secretary of the Board shall be subject to approval of the State Government. Section 59 provides that the Board shall after taking credit for any sub-version from the State Government u/s 63, carry on its operation under the Act and adjust its tariffs. Section 61 provides that in February of each year the Board shall submit to the State Government a statement in the prescribed form of the assessed capital and revenue receipts and the expenditure for the ensuing year and the State Government shall after receipt of the said statement cause it to be laid on the table of both the houses of Legislature and further the Board shall take into consideration any comments made on the said statement in the State legislature. Section 60 provides that the Board with the previous approval of the State Government and in the case of extreme urgency may spend more than the amount prescribed u/s 62 of the Act Section 63 provides that the State Government may make subversions to the Board for the purpose of the Act and Section 64 provides that the State Government may from time to time advance loans to the Board, Section 78 gives power to the State Government to make rules. Section 78-A lays down that in discharge of its functions the Board shall be guided by the State Government. The various provisions of the Act, therefore, show that the Uttar Pradesh State Electricity Board is a corporation owned and controlled by the State Government and, therefore, it comes within the definition of the expression public sector corporation as defined in Section 3(p) of the Rent Act. The application moved by the landlord u/s 21(8) for enhancement of rent was, therefore, maintainable. 5. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner next submitted that the market value of the building assessed by the rent control and eviction officer is not correct and the rent fixed by him is highly excessive. I have examined the judgment and order of the Rent Control and Eviction officer as well as of the Additional District Judge. The orders are based upon appreciation of relevant evidence on record. The finding recorded by the authorities on the market value of the building is a finding of fact. It does not suffer from any error of law. It is, therefore, not possible to interfere with the finding of the authorities below in exercise of jurisdiction under Article 226 of the constitution. 6. The writ petition fails and is dismissed. The interim order if any is vacated.