JUDGMENT 1. - Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that she was allotted a plot of land for construction of industrial unit on 18.10.1989 and Patta was given to her on 19.1.1990. The Patta has been cancelled on 24.10.1990 on the ground that the petitioner has not started construction within 6 months. 3. According to the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, the said plot has been allotted to respondent No. 3 on account of some alleged conspiracy between the respondents. 4. On perusal of the record and after hearing the learned counsel for the parties, I am of the view that the allegation of alleged conspiracy between the respondents is not established. No doubt, favour has been shown to respondent No. 3 who has been allotted plot after cancellation of plot allotted to the petitioner. It is also an admitted fact that the petitioner has not started construction and therefore, the respondents were forced to take action for cancellation of the plot in favour of the petitioner. Respondent No. 3 has already constructed factory thereon and without going to any other matter, the writ petition is disposed of with the direction that the petitioner may be provided an alternate plot preferably with regard to the numbers for which application has already been moved by her and if the same are lying vacant.No order as to costs.Petition disposed of. *******