JUDGMENT Bhairo Prasad, Member. - This second appeal has been filed under Section 331(4) of U.P. Act No. 1 of 1951 against the decree and judgment of the Additional Commissioner, Varanasi Division, Varanasi dated 2.1.1985 passed in first appeal no.89/293/187/372 of 1976 against the decree and judgment of the Sub-Division Officer Chandauli, district Varanasi dated 20.7.1978 passed in a suit under Section 229B of U.P. Act No. 1 of 1951. 2. The appellant filed a suit in the trial court that he is in possession over plot no. 107/14 area 0-82 decimal of village Gauriya, Pargana Ralhupur, district Varanasi but his name is not recorded over the disputed plot. He also pleaded that there is his house and there are many trees and bamboo clumps in the disputed plots. The suit was contested by the State that the plot in suit is property of Gaon Sabha. After taking the evidence of the parties the trial court dismissed the suit on 20.7.1978. The first appeal was filed against that decree and judgment, that too was dismissed. 3. I have heard the leaerned counsel for the parties. Perused the record. 4. Both the court below have given a concurrent finding. There is no any evidence to prove the possession of the appellant over the disputed plot before the enforcement of the U.P.Z.A. and L.R. Act. In these circumstances of the case the findings recorded by both the courts below that the appellant has not acquired any right and title over the disputed plots is sustainable in this second appeal too. I therefore do not find any force in this appeal is also dismissed with costs.