JUDGMENT : Mr. T.C. Sharma, Advocate representing the respondent, along with Mr. Arun Sharma, Mr. B.K. Prasad, Petitioner-in-person and a female student of law visited the Nari Niketan to find out whether the inmates of the Niketan are being looked after properly and the management is following various suggestions which have been placed on the record by the learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Sharma has submitted a report which we have taken on record. We have also perused the affidavit filed by Mrs. Kanchan Kataria, Superintendent, Nari Niketan, who is also present in the Court. We have gone through the report and the affidavit and we are satisfied that by and large the Nari Niketan is functioning satisfactorily. Mr. M.S. Ganesh, learned counsel for the petitioner, has invited our attention to the fact that there are some mentally deficient inmates who are being kept at the Nari Niketan. According to him, such patients should be transferred to some other appropriate medical institutions. Mr, V.C. Mahajan, learned senior counsel appearing for the Nari Niketan, states that the administration shall get all the mentally deficient inmates examined from the experts and if they are so advised by the medical experts, the patients will be sent to the specialised medical institutions. Nothing more need be done in this petition as at present. 2. We place on record the appreciation for the petitioner who has done good job by bringing to our notice the functioning of the Nari Niketan by way of this public interest litigation. We give liberty to the petitioner to approach this Court as and when it is necessary in the interest of the inmates of the Nari Niketan. The writ petition is disposed of, accordingly.