JUDGMENT (1) Smt. Kankari had only a life interest and, therefore, she was not competent to execute the sale-deed. (2) The appellant had right of pre-emption under the Qanoon Mal (Gwalior) which the appellant wants to exercise. 1t leaves no room for doubt that the law laid down in 1972 JLJ 482 was observed in letter and spirit both. The appeal was heard along with amendment application. It may be that the order did not suit the applicant which has resulted in the review petition filed. Consequently, they have filed review petitions. Two questions were framed by this Court, referred earlier, and after allowing the amendment application it was directed that the trial Court shall admit evidence and decide the case afresh in the light of the amendment. The points framed by this Court appears to be mixed questions of law and fact as a result of which a direction was given that the trial Judge shall decided the case after admitting evidence keeping in view the amendment which was allowed here. I do not find that any miscarriage of justice has taken place and there is anything on record which could have prevented this Court from granting the amendment application. The review petitions have no force and they are consequently rejected. Let the directions given earlier be complied with without further delay. 1972 JLJ 482 relied on. Petition dismissed.