Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Madras Auto Service Private LTD.
1993-01-07
G.N.RAY, M.N.VENKATACHALIAH
body1993
DigiLaw.ai
(1) ALL these matters are covered by the pronouncement of this court in Second I.T.O. v. Stumpp Schuele & Somappa (P) Ltd. (2) WE do not consider it necessary or appropriate to entertain any contention suggesting that reasoning in the said judgment suffers from infirmities. It is as important that law be certain as it is correct. These appeals are, accordingly, dismissed but without any order as to costs.