Judgment 1. The petitioners in this application have prayed for quashing a letter dated 2-12-1991 as contained in Annexure 8 to the writ application, whereby and whereunder respondent No. 5 directed the petitioners to clear off all arrears of bills of the ex-owner for providing a new connection to him as also for issuance of a writ of or in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents to supply electrical energy to the premises of the petitioners. 2. The fact of the matter lies in a very narrow compass. 3. An Advertisement was issued in daily newspaper Hindustan Times that Bihar State Credit and Investment Corporation intends to put the lands, building, plant and machineries of M/s. S. R. Fertilizer and Chemical Pvt. Ltd. Bela Industrial Area, Muzaffarpur on auction and invited tenders from the persons who intended to buy the same. Pursuant to the said advertisement, the petitioner No. 2 submitted his tender and his offer of about Rs. 8,00000.00 (eight lacs) having been found to be the highest, the same was accepted. 4. A writ application was filed in this Court by S.R. Fertilizers and Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. which was numbered as C.W.J.C. No. 2740 of 1991. An interim order of stay was passed in the aforementioned case as a result whereof the petitioner No. 2 could not obtain delivery of possession but by an order dated 15-11-1991, the said writ application was dismissed. Thereafter, delivery of possession was effected on 23-11-1991. Thereafter, a Private Limited Company was constituted in the name and style of petitioner No. 1 and it sent a requisition for supply of electrical energy to the petitioner by giving a new connection. According to the petitioners, the respondent Boards has adopted a policy decision regard to supply of electrical energy to the buyers of industrial units which would be evident from the letter dated 4-9-1978 by which the General Manager-cum-Chief Engineers were directed that new entrepreneurs should not be compelled to pay the bills of the previous owners if they are not connected with it. The aforementioned letter dated 4-9-1978 is contained in Annexure 6 to the writ application. 5. The aforementioned letter dated 4-9-1978 is contained in Annexure 6 to the writ application. 5. The petitioners have contended that under the terms and conditions laid down by the BICICO for sale of unit in question, the petitioner is liable only to pay the liabilities of industrial area and not other liabilities including the liabilities of the previous owner by way of non-payment of dues towards electrical energy. However, by reason of the impugned order dated 2-12-1991, respondent No. 5 directed that unless and until the dues of M/s. S. R. Fertilizers and Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. is cleared no new electrical connection would be granted to the petitioners. The BICICO, however, by letter bearing memo No. 793 dated 4-7-1992 also requested the Executive Engineer, Bihar State Electricity Board, Muzaffarpur, to grant electric connection to the petitioner as the aforementioned M/s. S. R. Fertilizers and Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. are two separate companies. 6. The question which arises for consideration in this application is as to whether the Bihar State Electricity Board was justified in refusing new connection to the petitioners. 7. This aspect of the matter has been dealt with in details in a recent decision of this Court in Suman Packaging (Pvt) Ltd. V/s. Chairman, Bihar State Electricity Board (C.W.J.C. No. 5358 of 1992) which has been disposed of on 22-7-1993 wherein it has been held that in view of its own circulars as also the statutory liability to supply electrical energy to a consumer, it cannot refuse to supply electrical energy to a purchaser of any unit sold in auction. 8. Apart from the aforementioned decision, it is evident that the Chairman of the Board himself has taken a decision which has been communicated by the Engineer in Chief to all General Manager-cum-Chief Engineer vide his letter dated 4-9-1978, as contained in Annexure 6, which reads thus :- "(i) The extension of power supply means H.T. or L. T. to the Industrial Estate shall be done at the Boards cost. (ii) In cases where a shed is one Industrial Estate was vacated by an entrepreneur and a new entrepreneur occupied it subsequently shall not be asked to pay arrears of electricity revenue due from the previous occupant of the shed provided the Director of industries or the Managing Director Industrial Area Development Authority certifies in writing, that the present occupant has no connection with the previous occupant and he is in no way liable to pay the arrears of the previous occupant. In such cases the aforesaid certificate shall be put up to the Electrical Superintending Engineer concerned and he will direct that (i) a new connection be given to the present occupant and (ii) steps be taken to realise the arrears through adjustment of the security deposit of the previous occupant and if necessary, by filing certificate case against him. This order is applicable on (faint) in cases of consumer therein of Electric Energy of Industrial Estate / Areas. In cases of consumers other than in the Industrial Estate, Boards Order No. 1033 dated 20-6-1970 shall continue to apply. It takes immediate effect." 9. The Bihar State Electricity Board is a State within the meaning of Art. 12 of the Constitution of India. Apart from its statutory obligations, it is also bound by its own policy decision and any deviation or departure therefrom would attract the wrath of Art. 14 of the Constitution of India. 10. The attitude on the part of the Bihar State Electricity Board, therefore, cannot be appreciated and thus the impugned order dated 2-12-1991 as contained in Annexure 8 to the writ application cannot be sustained. It is accordingly quashed. 11. The respondents are hereby directed to supply the electrical energy to the petitioners in terms of the provisions contained in clause 6 of the Schedule appended to the Indian Electricity Act, 1910 with utmost expedition and preferably within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 12. This application is, thus, allowed with the aforementioned directions. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioners shall also be entitled to costs which is quantified at Rs. 2500.00. Application allowed.