Research › Browse › Judgment

Supreme Court of India · body

1993 DIGILAW 46 (SC)

Special Reference No. 1/93 Under Article 143(1) of The Constitution of India (With Office Report) (For Difrections) v. ABC

1993-01-12

G.N.RAY, M.N.VENKATACHALIAH

body1993
JUDGMENT : 1. This is a Presidential Reference under Article 143 of the Constitution of India referring the following question for the consideration and opinion of this Court: "Whether a Hindu temple or any Hindu religious structure existed prior to the construction of the Ram Janma Bhumi-Babri Masjid (including the premises of the inner and outer courtyards of such structure) in the area on which the structure stood?" 2. We have heard the learned Attorney General on the Reference. Sri R. K. Garg, learned Senior counsel sought leave to raise a preliminary objection to the Reference on behalf of U.P. Sunni Wakf Board, plaintiffs in the transferred suit No. OS 4/89 said to be pending in the High Court of Allahabad, Lucknow Bench. Similarly, Sri OP Sharma, learned Senior counsel on behalf of Mohd. Aslant @ Bhure, said to be a petitioner in writ petition Nos. 972 and 977 of 1991 on the file of High Court of Allahabad where related questions are said to be pending, also wanted to make his submissions as to the parties who should be permitted to participate. 3. The contention of Sri R.K. Garg, is that before the purported Reference could even be taken up for hearing the Court should decide, as a preliminary question, whether this can be said to be valid Reference under Article 143 at all. He placed his submissions as to why, according to him, a question of this kind cannot be entertained as a Reference. 4. We do not propose to consider these objections as to the validity of the Reference at this stage. 5. We direct that this matter be placed before a Bench of five Judges of this Court for consideration of the matter, including the preliminary objections raised by Shri R.K. Garg, learned Senior counsel. 6. In order to enable and assist the Bench to decide, and as to who should be notified in the proceedings, we direct that at this stage, notices should go to the State of UP, the Advocate General of the State of UP and the Union of India. 7. The matter shall be placed before the Constitution Bench on 21st January, 1993.