JUDGMENT The revision is directed against the order dated 9.7.9.2 of Addl. Judge to the Court of District Judge, Kukshi (Distt. Dhar) passed in Civil Suit No. 11-A/92. The brief history of the case is that the plaintiffs-applicants are challenging certain auction sale by way of a suit which is pending. They wanted to show irregularity in the proceedings relating to attachment before auction and for that reason they filed an application to the effect that record of the Execution case may be summoned. The learned trial Court rejected the application with the observations that the parties can file copies of the documents as they will be public documents. Hence, this revision. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the non-applicants while starting the executing proceedings did not file the required documents including the Khasra numbers for showing the identity of the land and therefore it would not be possible for him to get copy of these documents which have not been filed and he wants to show these irregularities in the case. Learned counsel for the non-applicant on the other hand submitted that under O. 13 R. 10 CPC it is the discretion of the Court to call for the record and there is no jurisdictional error. No doubt, it is true that o. 13 R. 10 CPC gives a discretion to the Court for calling record, but the direction is to be exercised judicially and in such a situation where a plaintiff wants to show the irregularities in the proceedings in non-filing of certain documents necessary for the proceeding it would be difficult for him to get the copy of such documents which is not in existence. It can be demonstrated only by calling the file. In the opinion of this Court, therefore, learned trial Court has not exercised jurisdiction properly as vested in him. The revision, therefore, succeeds. The impugned order is set aside and it is directed that the learned trial Court shall call for the record and proceed with the case in accordance with law. Any observation in this revision petition is limited to disposal of this petition alone. It should not be taken into consideration for the purpose of adjudication of the case on merits.