JUDGMENT : 1. It appears that during the pendency of the present proceedings, the Committee headed by Mr. Justice Saikia has submitted as many as 13 interim reports making various recommendations. Mr. Goswami the learned senior Counsel appearing, on behalf of the Ministry of Environment in the Government of India states that the ministry would like to submit its response to the various recommendations made by the Committee because it has reservations in regard to certain recommendations. It would, therefore, like the Ministry of Environment to prepare a Table, Column (1) whereof would state the number of the interim report, column (2) could contain the recommendations made by the Committee, Column (3) would state briefly the response of the Ministry of Environment and Column (4) would be reserved for remarks by the petitioner M.C. Mehta. The table any be prepared within six weeks from today and copy served on Mr. M.C. Mehta. Mr. Mehta will complete Column (4) of the Table with his remarks and present the same to the Court so that the Court is able to appreciate the points of view of the Committee, the Ministry of Environment as well as Mr. M.C. Mehta, the petitioner herein. The counsel for the Union of India will furnish to Mr. Mehta sufficient number of copies of the Table to enable him to complete the fourth column and present the table to the Court as well as return completed copies to the learned counsel for the Union of India. This he may do within four weeks after he has received the Table from the counsel for the Union of India. We do hope that having regard to the seriousness of the problem of environmental pollution every party will show a sence of urgency in the matter and will strictly adhere to the time-schedule so that this Court may to able to deal will the matter effectively immediately after the summer vacation. 2. Let the petitions come up in the first week of August, 1995.