JUDGMENT This revision petition, presented under S. 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure (for short, 'the Code') is directed against the order dated 3.11.93 refusing the adjournment for cross examination of the plaintiffs' witnesses. The right of cross-examination is indeed valuable right and is powerful weapon in the hands of the adversary. Normally, this should not be denied. However, the right should be exercised in reasonable manner without causing undue procrastination. The conduct of the applicant cannot be labelled as totally fauit-free, the procedural wrangle should not become queller of the cause of justice. It is well to remember that justice should not only be done but should appear to be done. In the circumstances, the order for closing such right is subverted and the applicant is granted opportunity to cross-examine the witnesses, as named below, of the NAs subject to the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall pay costs of Rs. 100/- to the NAs as compensation for causing delay, as a condition precedent for taking advantage of opportunity of cross-examination. (b) The applicant shall avail of the opportunity on 17.1.94 and shall not seek adjournemnt for this purpose and the applicant is permitted to cross-examine the witnesses Chandraprakash, Giriraj, Manilal and Parasmal. The NAs shall produce the aforesaid witnesses on 17.1.94. The trial Court is, thus, directed to post the case for cross-examination of the aforesaid witnesses on 17.1.94. The applicant is directed to produce certified copy of this order before the trial Court immediately for further action as above. This revision petition thus stands finally disposed of in the terms indicated above. There shall be no order as to costs.