( 1 ) SPECIAL leave granted in both cases. ( 2 ) THIS order will dispose of appeals arising out of Special Leave Petition (C) Nos. 16582 of 1992 and 8553 of 1993. ( 3 ) THE Labour court deciding an industrial dispute between the parties ordering reinstatement of the worker with full back wages. On appeal, the industrial court affirmed the order of reinstatement but denied to the worker full back wages on the ground that he could not encash on his guilt, for tile guilt was fully proved against him. In the writ petition by the Management challenging the order of reinstatement the High court came to make the following observations: "in our opinion, it would he open to the Management 958 to negotiate this very proposal with the workman as and when he is reinstated and to place him in any other mill if he is willing. " THESE observation? were attracted because the Management contemplated transferring the worker to another place. Learned counsel for the Management has prayed before us that. this portion in the order be deleted as that would be problematic in the face of the standing orders operating to govern the relationship between the Management and the worker. The existence of the standing orders on this subject is not denied by the workman. Therefore, we are of the view that the afore-extraction was unnecessary to be incorporated in the order of the High court which has led to the present appeal in Special Leave Petition No. 16582 of 1992. We, therefore, allow its deletion. ( 4 ) INSOFAR as the question of back wages is concerned, the High court allowed the corresponding writ petition of the workman which is the subject-matter of Special Leave Petition No. 8552 of 1993 at the instance of the Management. It is difficult to comprehend any right in the workman to his claim to back wages in the face of his guilt having been established. The punishment imposed by the industrial court in appeal, in denial thereof, should not easily have been interfered with by the High court without cogent reasons. The worker through his counsel has now left to us to make a proportionate cut in back wages. In the circumstances. The punishment imposed by the industrial court in appeal, in denial thereof, should not easily have been interfered with by the High court without cogent reasons. The worker through his counsel has now left to us to make a proportionate cut in back wages. In the circumstances. taking the overall picture in view, we order, in substitution of the order of the High court, that the workman be paid 25 percent of the back wages only. If any amount, in the meantime, has been paid towards back wages, that be adjusted. ( 5 ) WITH these directions, these appeals are disposed of. No costs.