Research › Browse › Judgment

Karnataka High Court · body

1994 DIGILAW 178 (KAR)

K. SUMTIHRA v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

1994-07-15

KUMAR RAJARATNAM

body1994
KUMAR RAJARATNAM, J. ( 1 ) THIS writ petition is taken up for final disposal with the consent of both the parties. ( 2 ) THE short point on which this writ petition can be disposed of is whether the government can reject the request for reference on the ground that the 2nd respondent would not come within the jurisdiction of the industrial disputes act. ( 3 ) THE government has gone to the extent of holding that the 2nd respondent is not an industry within the meaning of the industrial disputes act. It is well-settled law that it is not open to the government to hold as to whether the 2nd respondent is an industry or not and it is entirely within the jurisdiction of the labour court. ( 4 ) IN these circumstances, there will be a writ of mandamus directing the first respondent to consider afresh the case of the petitioner and to dispose of the application in the light the observations made by me. ( 5 ) THE first respondent will dispose of the application for reference within a period of four weeks from the date of the order being communicated to the first respondent. ( 6 ) THERE will be no orders as to costs. ( 7 ) THIS writ petition is disposed of accordingly. ( 8 ) ALL the contentions raised by the 2nd respondent and the 3rd respondent are permitted to be raised by them in the event of reference being made. --- *** --- .