JUDGMENT 1. - Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned P.P. Case diary perused. 2. It is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the incident took place in the field of the petitioner and the petitioner and his son Sajjan Singh were assaulted by the members of the complainant party. It is also contended that in the FIR the prosecution case was that the petitioner was having an axe-while the co-accused Bai Singh was having `Jeli', but subsequently, the version was changed to implicate the petitioner to make him liable for the grievous injury, which was caused by`Jeli'. 3. Taking into consideration all the facts & circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant the benefit of pre-arrest bail to the petitioner under section 438 Cr.P.C. 4. The SHO PS Surajgarh District Jhunjhunu in F.I.R. No. 126/93 is, therefore, directed that in the event of arrest of petitioner Prabhu Singh s/o Shri Keshar Singh, he be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 5,000/-with one surety in the like amount to his satisfaction on the following conditions : (a) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (b) that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case, so as dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court, or to any other police officers. *******