Research › Browse › Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court · body

1994 DIGILAW 205 (MP)

Vishnu v. State of M. P.

1994-03-16

TEJ SHANKAR

body1994
JUDGMENT Heard. This application is filed on behalf of applicant Vishnu. Learned counsel for the applicant contends that according to the prosecution, the applicant was armed with a saria (iron rod). No specific role has been assigned to him except that he was standing. Learned counsel for the non-applicant-State as also for the complainant contend that the applicant along with other co-accused caused injuries. The applicant was armed with saria, Bajarangi attacked with sword on the head, Ramnath attacked with Lathi and co-accused Gopal attacked with Pharsa. I have considered the contentions raised and considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the nature of injuries and the post-mortem report, I am of the view that the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail. Accordingly, the applicant is allowed and it is ordered that the applicant be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 20,000/- with two sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of the C.J .M. Gwalior for his appearance on all dates of hearing in the case.