Research › Browse › Judgment

Kerala High Court · body

1994 DIGILAW 78 (KER)

Krishna Kumar v. Stale of Kerala

1994-02-14

P.KRISHNA MOORTHY

body1994
Judgment :- When the CM.P. came up for hearing it was agreed that the original petition itself may be disposed of. 2. The question involved in this original petition is as to whether a beer parlour will come within the purview of R.e(2) of Abkari Shops (Disposal in auction) Rules hereinafter referred to as Disposal in Auction Rules. R.e(2) prohibits among other the location of a foreign liquor shop within the prohibited distance of 400 metres IVom an. educational institution, temple and certain other institutions mentioned therein. The question to be decided is as to whether a foreign liquor shop will include a beer parlour. 3. Foreign Liquor Shop as such is not defined in the Kerala Abkari Shops (Disposal in auction) Rules. But it is mentioned in R.2(1) that all other words and expressions used therein and not defined in those rules shall have the meaning respectively assigned to them in the Abkari Act and other rules framed therein. S.3(13) of the Abkari Act defines 'Foreign Liquor' as including all liquor other than country liquor and S.3(10) defines liquor as including beer as well. Accordingly beer shop will also be a foreign liquor shop in accordance with Kerala Abkari Shops (Disposal in auction) Rules, 1974 and the distance rule mentioned in e(2) will apply to them as well. 4. The counsel for the petitioners contended that the licence (FL 11) to the beer parlour is granted under the foreign liquor rules and as such the Disposal in Auction Rules cannot have any application. I am not inclined to agree with this contention. R.3(1B) of Disposal in Auction Rules provides that Kerala Tourism Development Corporation Ltd. shall have the exclusive privilege to obtain FL 11 licence for the purpose of running a beer parlour. It is clear from the above that Disposal in Auction Rules deal with beer parlours (FL 11 licence) as well and the provisions of R.e(2) will apply to such shop also. It is absolutely clear that R.e(2) of Disposal in Auction Rules applies to all kinds of foreign liquor shops. I have already held that a beer parlour is also a foreign liquor shop and accordingly R.e(2) shall apply. to such shops also. It is absolutely clear that R.e(2) of Disposal in Auction Rules applies to all kinds of foreign liquor shops. I have already held that a beer parlour is also a foreign liquor shop and accordingly R.e(2) shall apply. to such shops also. Counsel for the petitioners relied on a Division Bench decision of this court in O.P.4924 of 1981 and other connected cases in regard to the issue of a Hotel (Restaurant) license.' So far as such licenses are concerned, there is a specific provision in the foreign liquor rules regarding the distance to be maintained from certain institutions. R.13(3) of Foreign Liquor Rules provides that such Hotels shall be located beyond 200 metres from an educational institution, temple etc. When there is a special rule in regard to a particular matter that will prevail over the general rules. But there is no such provision in the Foreign Liquor Rules in regard to Beer Parlours. Accordingly the general rule contained in R.e(2) of the Disposal in Auction Rules in regard to Foreign Liquor Shop applies to Beer Parlours as well. The Government was right in issuing Ext. P7 order. There is no merit in this original petition and it is dismissed. No costs.