JUDGMENT 1. - Normally, this Court is reluctant to re-consider the second bail application under Section 438 Criminal Procedure Code but the learned Counsel has brought to my notice some special circumstances. 2. It was contended by the learned Counsel that after rejection of the earlier bail application, the statements of the two injured persons have been recorded by the Magistrate under Section 164 Criminal Procedure Code and in their statements they have not named the petitioners to be the authors of any injury to them. The case of the co-accused Mukesh was re-considered by this Court in the light of the subsequent event and he was granted pre-arrest bail vide order dated 27.5.94 in S.B.Cr.Misc. Bail Application No. 2378/94. The case of the petitioner stands at par to that of the co-accused Mukesh. 3. The learned Additional P.P. after seeking the case diary is not in a position to controvert the above facts. 4. In these circumstances, the petitioner also deserves to be given the same treatment under Section 438 Cr.P.C.The SHO Police Station Weir in F.I.R. No. 72/92 is, therefore, directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioner Ram Khilari alias Khillo son of Shri Sarman he shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 5,000/- (five thousand) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the S.H.O. concerned, on the following conditions: "1. that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a Police Officer as and when required; "2. that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly, make, any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case, so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court, or any Police Officer; and "3. that the petitioner shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court. Petition allowed. *******