Research › Browse › Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court · body

1994 DIGILAW 819 (MP)

Champatlal Patel v. Vrindawan Mishra

1994-11-08

I.P.RAO

body1994
JUDGMENT The allegation of the applicant, who filed a private complaint before the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Sarangarh is that the first non-applicant, who is a fisheries Extension Officer and who was appointed by the Collector as the Asstt. Returning Officer for conducting elections of the Sar-Panch of village Mehadhole, has abated the filing of forged nomination paper, and in spite of filing of affidavits by the applicant and his proposer, has failed to inquire into the matter. When the case was to be taken cognizance of by the trial Court, the first non-applicant filed an application stating that the Court cannot take cognizance of the offence without sanction, as required u/s. 197, Cr.P.C. as Fisheries Extension Officer is removable from his office only by the State Government. The trial Court rejected his objection by its order dated 26.11.1990. On revision, the learned Sessions Judge allowed the objection by his order dated 10.4.92. Challenging the correctness of that order, the complainant filed this revision. As submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant, the nomination of the first non-applicant as Assistant Returning Officer for the Gram Panchayat election is by the Collector, but not by the State Government. The exemption claimed by the first non-applicant u/s. 197 (1), Cr.P.C. will be applicable only if he is alleged to have committed an offence while acting or purporting to act in the discharge of his official duty. I agree with the submission made by the learned counsel for the applicant that the act alleged against the first non-applicant was not committed by him, while acting or purporting to act in the discharge of his official duty as Fisheries Extension Officer, which office is removable by the State Government. The alleged act was done by him in his capacity as Assistant Returning Officer, but not in the capacity of Fisheries Extension Officer. The alleged act was done by him in his capacity as Assistant Returning Officer, but not in the capacity of Fisheries Extension Officer. The allegation that the Assistant Returning Officer has abetted filing of a forged nomination paper, if found true, i.s a matter of serious concern, which affects the entire election process and, therefore, the first non-applicant cannot be permitted to escape the penal consequences of the alleged action on the technical ground of want of sanction u/s. 197 (1) Cr.P.C. Inasmuch as, the offence alleged against him was not committed while acting or purporting to act in the discharge of his official duty as Fisheries Extension Officer, but only in the capacity of Assistant Returning Officer, which post is not removable by the Government, I hold that sanction of the Govt. u/s. 197 (1), Cr.P.C. is not required for prosecuting the first non-applicant. The revision is, therefore, allowed, setting aside the order of the learned A.S.J. Raigarh in Cr. Rev. No. 131/1990. The learned Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Sarangarh is directed to dispose of the Cr. Case No. 100/1990 pending on his file expeditiously.