JUDGMENT : A. Pasayat, J. - Sole question that arises in this writ application for consideration is whether the petitioner was a defaulter to attract disqualification for contesting election to the office of President, Sambalpur Wholesale Consumer Co-operative Society (in short the 'Apex Society'). 2. The factual background as. projected by the petitioner is almost undisputed. Petitioner filed nomination for the election to the office of President. Notification was issued for the election in question on 24-3-1994. The Sasan Service Co-operative Society (in short, 'the society') filed an application before the Assistant Registrar of Co-operative Societies for a declaration that the society was a non-defaulting society so that the. petitioner would be eligible to contest the election as a Member of Apex Society. The petitioner also, filed a separate application for granting interim order permitting him to contest the election. The Assistant Registrar admitted the case and passed an order of stay. Petitioner filed his nomination on 10-4-1994. Chandra Kumar Purohit ( opp. party No, 1 ) also filed his nomination representing Maneswar Service Co-operative Society. Both the society and opp. party No. 1's .society belong to Constituency No. 3. Opp. party No. 1 made a motion for rejection of the petitioner's nomination on the ground that the society had failed to pay dues after service of notice and therefore, incurred disqualification u/s 28 (3-a) of the Orissa Co-operative Societies Act, 1962 (in short, the 'Act'). The prayer was rejected and the election proceeded. Opp. party No.1 moved the Co-operative Tribunal, Orissa (in short, the 'Tribunal') for interference. The Tribunal has set aside the election of the petitioner, and opp. party No. 1 has been declared as Member of Constituency No. 3-on the basis that the petitioner's society. suffered from disqualification as provided in Section 28:(3-a) of the Act. 3. According to the petitioner, the conclusions of the Tribunal are erroneous, while the opposite party No. 1 supports them. Fate of this case hangs on interpretation of expression "due" as appearing in Section 28 (3-a) of the Act. The said provision read as follows : "28. Society to have a committee: X X X X X X (3-a) A representative of a society or a body corporate shall not be eligible for. Fate of this case hangs on interpretation of expression "due" as appearing in Section 28 (3-a) of the Act. The said provision read as follows : "28. Society to have a committee: X X X X X X (3-a) A representative of a society or a body corporate shall not be eligible for. being chosen or for continuing as a member or President of the committee of any other society in cases where the society or the body corporate which he represents- (i) has failed to pay any amount due in cash or in kind, to the society or any other society on account of any loan or otherwise within three months from the date of notice by such society for payment of such dues; or (ii) ceases from the membership of the society; or (iii) is ordered to be wound up or dissolved." The pivotal expression is "has failed to pay any amount due" within three months from the date of notice by such society for payment of such dues. According to the petitioner mere demand and non-payment would not bring in application of the default clause, so as to attract a disqualification. Reliance was placed on a decision of this Court in Gobind Ch. Panda Vs. Darsan Ch. Rout and Others which related to a case under the Orissa Grama Panchayat Act, 1964. Reliance was also placed on a decision of this Court in Mahendar Prasad Rout Vs. The Election Officer and Others, where the language used was "accrued due'. "The Tribunal made a distinction between "accrued due'' and "due" and held that use of the expression "'accused" made the difference as "accured" obviously would involve quantification. The Tribunal was of the view that the Orissa Co-operative Societies Rules, 1965 tin short, the 'Rules') define "default" to mean adjudicated dues, and if the Legislature wanted that it was the only adjudicated dues which were relevant for the purpose of disqualification, it could have and the words "defaulted dues", instead of using "arrear dues". 4. It is to be noticed that the Act does not "refer to "arrear dues". It deals with failure to pay any amount "due"; "Defaulter" as defined in the Rule's means any society against which or any person" against whom a decree or order u/s 103 has been obtained and. included such person or persons against whom proceedings u/s 90 are taken. It deals with failure to pay any amount "due"; "Defaulter" as defined in the Rule's means any society against which or any person" against whom a decree or order u/s 103 has been obtained and. included such person or persons against whom proceedings u/s 90 are taken. The word "due" means immediately payable in its common signification, or a debt contracted but payable in future. (per Gibson. J. Irisb Land Commission v. Massereene: (1904) 2 IRR 513. Darling, J. said, "I think, in a legal sense, that money only can be said to be "due", which may be recovered by action. That which a man is under no legal obligation to repay, for whatever reason is in my opinion no longer money "due", in Hibernian Bank v. Yourrell (1919) 1 TR R 310. A debt or other obligation is due when it is legally enforceable, i. e., when the creditor has a right to demand payment and to enforce collection. It means presently payable. It connotes an existing obligation. The word "due" is, capable of various meanings. The word "due1' as an adjective is stated to mean (1) that is owing or payable, as a debt Due (substantive). (2) that which is due, a debt, (3) that which is due by any one, (4) a legal charge, toll, tribute, fee or the like (See Shorter Oxford English Dictionary). In Wharton's Law Lexicon its meaning is stated to be "anything owing. That which one contracts to pay or perform, another, that which law or justice requires to be paid or done, lt should be observed that a debt is said to be "due" the instant that it has existence as a debt ;.it may be payable at a future time." - In Words and Phrases, Permanent Edition Volume 13 (West Publishing Co.) various shades (meaning of the word "due" are given. Some of them are given here. The word "due" is only equivalent to "payable. The word 'due" considered by itself has many definitions. Bouvier defines is; in its first and broadest sense as that which is just and proper and in another and least general sense, as "what ought to be paid; that may be demanded". In its primary sense means "owing". At times it signifies a simple indebtedness without reference to the time of payment. At other times it shows that the day of payment or tender is passed. In its primary sense means "owing". At times it signifies a simple indebtedness without reference to the time of payment. At other times it shows that the day of payment or tender is passed. 5. The word as used" in the Act means a sum legally recoverable, i. e., sum which is admitted or proved to be due and cannot be extended to sum which is alleged or claimed to be due. 'Due' always imports a fixed and settled obligation or liability. It means a legal liability to return something. . The amount in order to constitute "due" must be legally enforceable. When a dispute is raised about payability of a sum, it cannot be called to be an amount due. Since, in the present case, there was dispute about payability, it cannot be said that there was any amount due in respect or which there was default to pay. The view of the Tribunal is indefensible. The impugned judgment in C. T. E. D. No. 51 of 1994 is set aside. it has to be held that the election of the petitioner, as a Member of the Apex Society is in order. The writ application is accordingly allowed. No costs. D.M. Patnaik, J. 6. I agree. Final Result : Allowed