JUDGMENT He is heard on I.A. No. 254 of 95. The application is wholly misconceived. It is impossible to make a direction. that a specific type of road be made at the place of the choice of the petitioner. It is for the State and Central Governments to see what amount is in their Treasury and how it is required to be spent. The application is, therefore, dismissed. Parties heard finally. The grievance of the petitioner is that the Badnavar road be made an A-I road like the Agra Bombay road and direction be issued to the State Government to comply it. No doubt the Courts can test the decision of the State Government and Central Government and look to its fairness. But this does not mean that the Courts can issue directions for construction of roads without looking to the financial position of the Governments. It does not appear that the petitioner has approached the State Government or the Central Government for this purpose. It may be observed here that the roads can be constructed only if there are financial resources with the State Government or the Central Government. It may also be observed that it is not only the persons of Badnavar who are interested in getting roads constructed, but there are millions and millions of people living in villages who would also like to have facilities of good roads, hospitals educational institutions etc. The first priority has to be given to them and thereafter only the financial resources should be diverted to towns and cities. In view of the above, this petition is misconceived. However, it is expected that the State Government would look into the grievances of the public that the roads are repaired and is brought to such a standard so that it can be used by the public safely and properly. The petition is, therefore, dismissed.