JUDGMENT This appeal is directed against the award dated 25.6.1993 of M.A.C.T., Mhow passed in Claim Case No. 95/87 whereby the appellant has been awarded compensation of Rs. 46,000/- in all for having sustained injury in the motor accident on 9.11.1985. This is not in dispute that Mangilal, husband of present appellant was driving a motor-cycle No. MPM 9017 and were proceeding from Kadampura to Mhow. One truck No. MBC 1632, driven by respondent No. 1, owned by respondent No. 2 and insured with respondent No. 3 came with a high speed and dashed against the motor cycle. Sajjanbai, appellant was injured, she sustained fracture of Femur and the right Patela bone. Mangilal died in the accident. Two separate claim petitions were filed. Learned tribunal on the claim petition filed by the present appellant for her injuries has awarded Rs. 6,000/- towards expenses for treatment; Rs. 15,000/- for the physical pain and agony; and Rs. 25,000/- as general damages. The evidence of the Doctor, as discussed in Para 13 of the Judgment shows that there was a fracture in Femur which has been united now and the fracture of right Patela which had to be removed, which has caused shortening of the leg by two inches. This has created a permanent partial disability to the extent of 30%. The appellant is a house-wife, looking after agricultural work. She can pursue those works by using a high heel shoe chappels, as well. Rs. 40,000/- awarded for physical pain and for general damages, if deposited in a nationalised bank, is likely to fetch an interest nearly of Rs. 400/- P.M. and that would be more than 30% earnings of the appellant. In such a situation it cannot be said that the compensation awarded is unjust or in any way less than amount which ought to have been awarded. In our opinion, the compensation appears to be just and proper and calls for no interference. As such the appeal is dismissed without notice to the opposite party.